Hindutva as a Way of Life: Verdicts and Voices
It examines the meaning and interpretation of Hinduism and Hindutva through the lens of judgments delivered by the Supreme Court of India. The book opens by analysing landmark cases in which religious sects like the Ramakrishna Mission and the Swaminarayan sect sought recognition as distinct religions. In addressing these matters, the Supreme Court was compelled to define Hinduism and concluded that it is not confined to a fixed set of texts or practices but is broad and inclusive in nature. The book also explores how the judiciary has dealt with the use of Hindutva in the context of election campaigns, particularly through cases in the 1990s where the Supreme Court held that Hindutva, as used in political discourse, does not amount to soliciting votes on the basis of religion.
A dedicated chapter simplifies the Supreme Court’s Ram Janmabhoomi verdict, which runs over a thousand pages, distilling its legal reasoning and evidentiary foundation into an accessible format for general readers. The book also includes an analysis of how the concept of Hindutva is perceived by the Prime Minister of India, based on a review of his public speeches and actions. Mr. Sood presents this material without revealing interpretative conclusions, encouraging readers to engage with the subject independently. Through these chapters, the book offers a legal and institutional exploration of Hindutva, grounded in judicial precedent and public discourse.
Foreword by Tushar Mehta
Foreword by Bibek Debroy
Contents at a Glance
Books
Mr. Sood has authored and contributed to several publications. His writings reflect on procedural challenges, judicial interpretation, and legal reform. These are often cited in legal academic and professional forums.


